On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 03:04:24PM -0600, Tim Cook wrote: > No. The whole point of a snapshot is to keep a consistent on-disk state > from a certain point in time. I'm not entirely sure how you managed to > corrupt blocks that are part of an existing snapshot though, as they'd be > read-only.
Physical corruption of the media Something outside of ZFS diddling bits on storage > The only way that should even be able to happen is if you took a > snapshot after the blocks were already corrupted. Any new writes would be > allocated from new blocks. It can be corrupted while it sits on disk. Since it's read-only, you can't force it to allocate anything and clean itself up. -- Darren _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
