I'm running Windows 7 64bit and VMware player 3 with Solaris 10 64bit
as a client. I have added additional hard drive to virtual Solaris 10
as physical drive. Solaris 10 can see and use already created zpool
without problem. I could also create additional zpool on the other
mounted raw device. I can also synchronize zfs file system to other
physical disk and the other zpool with zfs send/receive.

All those physical disks are presented in Windows 7 and not initialized.

The problem that I have now is that each created snapshot is always
equal to zero... zfs just not storing changes that I have made to the
file system before making a snapshot.

Before each snapshot I have added or deleted different files, so the
snapshot should archive those differences but this is not my case. :-(

My zfs list looks now like this:

 r...@sl-node01:~# zfs list
NAME                            USED  AVAIL  REFER  MOUNTPOINT
mypool01                       91.9G   137G    23K  /mypool01
mypool01/storage01             91.9G   137G  91.7G  /mypool01/storage01
mypool01/storag...@30032010-1      0      -  91.9G  -
mypool01/storag...@30032010-2      0      -  91.9G  -
mypool01/storag...@30032010-3      0      -  91.7G  -
mypool02                       91.9G   137G    24K  /mypool02
mypool02/copies                  23K   137G    23K  /mypool02/copies
mypool02/storage01             91.9G   137G  91.9G  /mypool02/storage01
mypool02/storag...@30032010-1      0      -  91.9G  -
mypool02/storag...@30032010-2      0      -  91.9G  -

As you can see each snapshot is equal to zero besides changes that I
have made to zfs content.

I would like to understand what is making virtual Solaris 10
impossible to track those changes with creating a snapshot?

Is it problem with Windows, VMware player or basically with mounted
raw device to virtual machine? Does someone has experinace with this
issue?


Regards,
Vladimir
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to