Hi Ryan,
You are seeing this CR:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6916574
zpool add -n displays incorrect structure
This is a display problem only.
Thanks,
Cindy
On 07/22/10 15:54, Ryan Schwartz wrote:
I've got a system running s10x_u7wos_08 with only half of the disks
provisioned. When performing a dry run of a zpool add, I'm seeing some strange
output:
root# zpool add -n vst raidz2 c0t2d0 c5t1d0 c4t1d0 c4t5d0 c7t1d0 c7t5d0 c6t1d0
c6t5d0 c1t1d0 c1t5d0 c0t1d0 raidz2 c0t5d0 c0t5d0 c4t4d0 c7t0d0 c7t4d0 c6t0d0
c6t4d0 c1t0d0 c1t4d0 c0t0d0 c0t4d0
would update 'vst' to the following configuration:
vst
raidz2
c5t3d0
c5t7d0
c4t3d0
c4t7d0
c7t3d0
c7t7d0
c6t3d0
c6t7d0
c1t3d0
c1t7d0
c0t3d0
raidz2
c0t7d0
c5t2d0
c5t6d0
c4t2d0
c4t6d0
c7t2d0
c7t6d0
c6t2d0
c6t6d0
c1t2d0
c1t6d0
raidz2
c0t2
c5t1
c4t1
c4t5
c7t1
c7t5
c6t1
c6t5
c1t1
c1t5
c0t1
raidz2
c0t5
c0t5
c4t4
c7t0
c7t4
c6t0
c6t4
c1t0
c1t4
c0t0
c0t4
I would expect the new configuration would use the full shorthand device names,
including the d0. Is this normal/expected output for a system on s10x_u7wos_08?
Thanks,
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
