Hi! > Hi all
> I just tested dedup on this test box running OpenIndiana (147) storing bacula > backups, and did some more testing on some datasets with ISO images. The > > results show so far that removing 30GB deduped datasets are done in a matter > of minutes, which is not the case with 134 (which may take hours). The tests > also show that the write speed to the pool is low, very low, if dedup is > enabled. This is a box with a 3GHz core2duo, 8 gigs of RAM, eight 2TB drives > and a 80GB x25m for the SLOG (4 gigs) and L2ARC (the rest of it). > So far I will conclude that dedup should be useful if storage capacity is > crucial, but not if performance is taken into concideration. > Mind, this is not a high-end box, but still, I think the numbers show > something Hi, it is probably due you have quite low amount of ram. I have similar setup, 10TB dataset that can handle 100MB/s writes easily, system has 24GB of ram. Yours Markus Kovero _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
