On Nov 2, 2010, at 12:10 AM, Ian Collins wrote: > On 11/ 2/10 08:33 AM, Mark Sandrock wrote: >> >> >> I'm working with someone who replaced a failed 1TB drive (50% utilized), >> on an X4540 running OS build 134, and I think something must be wrong. >> >> Last Tuesday afternoon, zpool status reported: >> >> scrub: resilver in progress for 306h0m, 63.87% done, 173h7m to go >> >> and a week being 168 hours, that put completion at sometime tomorrow night. >> >> However, he just reported zpool status shows: >> >> scrub: resilver in progress for 447h26m, 65.07% done, 240h10m to go >> >> so it's looking more like 2011 now. That can't be right.
>> >> > How is the pool configured? Both 10 and 12 disk RAIDZ-2. That, plus too much other io must be the problem. I'm thinking 5 x (7-2) would be better, assuming he doesn't want to go RAID-10. Thanks much for all the helpful replies. Mark > > I look after a very busy x5400 with 500G drives configured as 8 drive raidz2 > and these take about 100 hours to resilver. The workload on this box is > probably worst case for resivering, it receives a steady stream of snapshots. > > -- > Ian. > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
