sbdadm can be used with a regular ZFS file or a ZFS block device. Is there an advatage to using a ZFS block device and exporting it to comstar via sbdadm as opposed to using a file and exporting it? (e.g. performance or manageability?)
Also- let's say you have a 5G block device called pool/test You can resize it by doing: zfs set volsize=10G pool/test However if the device was already imported into comstar then stmfadm list-lu -v <guid> will still only report the original 5G block size. You can use sbdadm modify-lu -s 10G </path_to_block_device> but I'm not sure if there is a chance you might run into a size difference between ZFS and sbd. i.e.- if I specify 10G in ZFS, and I do an sbdadm modify-lu -s 10G is there any chance they won't align and I'll try to write past the end of the zvol? Thanks in advance- -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
