On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Cindy Swearingen
<cindy.swearin...@oracle.com> wrote:
> You might review your zpool history -il rpool output for clues.

This isn't a critical problem, it's just a point of annoyance since it
seems like something that shouldn't happen. It's also just a test host
that's led a hard life full of abuse and hardware swaps.

I'm not sure where to start looking in the history output. The pool
was created with snv_125 and upgraded to snv_133 when that became
available. It's been around for a bit over a year.

There were some failed upgrades from snv_134b to snv_151a. The devices
shown under 'zpool status' were different than the actual devices in
use, because they'd been moved to a new controller at some point.
After fixing that, the upgrade succeeded. It's possible that something
broke down during the many hoops that had to be jumped through
however.

I can mail you the send stream from rp...@copy if you think it would
help to find the problem. There's no priority to fixing it, other than
it being something weird that shouldn't have happened.

-B

-- 
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to