On Jan 29, 2011, at 4:14 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 1/29/2011 6:18 PM, Richard Elling wrote: >>> 0(offsite)# >> >> The next step is to run "zdb -l" and look for all 4 labels. Something like: >> zdb -l /dev/ada2 >> >> If all 4 labels exist for each drive and appear intact, then look more >> closely >> at how the OS locates the vdevs. If you can't solve the "UNAVAIL" problem, >> you won't be able to import the pool. > > > > Hmmm, doesnt look good on any of the drives.
I'm not sure of the way BSD enumerates devices. Some clever person thought that hiding the partition or slice would be useful. I don't find it useful. On a Solaris system, ZFS can show a disk something like c0t1d0, but that doesn't exist. The actual data is in slice 0, so you need to use c0t1d0s0 as the argument to zdb. -- richard > Before I give up, I will > try the drives in a different cage Monday. Unfortunately, its a 150km > away from me at our DR site > > > # zdb -l /dev/ada0 > -------------------------------------------- > LABEL 0 > -------------------------------------------- > failed to unpack label 0 > -------------------------------------------- > LABEL 1 > -------------------------------------------- > failed to unpack label 1 > -------------------------------------------- > LABEL 2 > -------------------------------------------- > failed to unpack label 2 > -------------------------------------------- > LABEL 3 > -------------------------------------------- > failed to unpack label 3 _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
