On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 11:09:45AM +1100, Daniel Carosone wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 03:52:49AM +0400, Jim Klimov wrote: > > Recently I stumbled upon a Nexenta+Supermicro report [1] about > > cluster-in-a-box with shared storage boasting an "active-active > > cluster" with "transparent failover". Now, I am not certain how > > these two phrases fit in the same sentence, and maybe it is some > > marketing-people mixup, > > One way they can not be in conflict, is if each host normally owns 8 > disks and is active with it, and standby for the other 8 disks.
Which, now that I reread it more carefully, is your case 1. Sorry for the noise. -- Dan.
pgphTDpO9Oucq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
