Hi,
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 15:13, "Hung-Sheng Tsao (Lao Tsao 老曹) Ph.D."
<laot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> what are the output of zpool status pool1 and pool2
> it seems that you have mix configuration of pool3 with disk and mirror
The other two pools show very similar outputs:
root@stor:~# zpool status pool1
pool: pool1
state: ONLINE
scan: resilvered 1.41M in 0h0m with 0 errors on Sun Dec 4 17:42:35 2011
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
pool1 ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t12d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t13d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t24d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t25d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t30d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t31d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror-3 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t32d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t33d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
logs
mirror-4 ONLINE 0 0 0
c2t2d0p6 ONLINE 0 0 0
c2t3d0p6 ONLINE 0 0 0
cache
c2t2d0p10 ONLINE 0 0 0
c2t3d0p10 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
root@stor:~# zpool status pool2
pool: pool2
state: ONLINE
scan: scrub canceled on Wed Dec 14 07:51:50 2011
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
pool2 ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t14d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t15d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t18d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t19d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t20d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t21d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror-3 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t22d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t23d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
logs
mirror-4 ONLINE 0 0 0
c2t2d0p7 ONLINE 0 0 0
c2t3d0p7 ONLINE 0 0 0
cache
c2t2d0p11 ONLINE 0 0 0
c2t3d0p11 ONLINE 0 0 0
The affected pool does indeed have a mix of straight disks and
mirrored disks (due to running out of vdevs on the controller),
however it has to be added that the performance of the affected pool
was excellent until around 3 weeks ago, and there have been no
structural changes nor to the pools neither to anything else on this
server in the last half year or so.
-jan
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
