how is the ram size
what is the zpool setup and what is your hba and hdd size and type


Sent from my iPad

On Jan 10, 2012, at 21:07, Ray Van Dolson <rvandol...@esri.com> wrote:

> Hi all;
> 
> We have a Solaris 10 U9 x86 instance running on Silicon Mechanics /
> SuperMicro hardware.
> 
> Occasionally under high load (ZFS scrub for example), the box becomes
> non-responsive (it continues to respond to ping but nothing else works
> -- not even the local console).  Our only solution is to hard reset
> after which everything comes up normally.
> 
> Logs are showing the following:
> 
>  Jan  8 09:44:08 prodsys-dmz-zfs2 scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: 
> /pci@0,0/pci8086,3410@9/pci1000,72@0 (mpt_sas0):
>  Jan  8 09:44:08 prodsys-dmz-zfs2        MPT SGL mem alloc failed
>  Jan  8 09:44:08 prodsys-dmz-zfs2 scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: 
> /pci@0,0/pci8086,3410@9/pci1000,72@0 (mpt_sas0):
>  Jan  8 09:44:08 prodsys-dmz-zfs2        Unable to allocate dma memory for 
> extra SGL.
>  Jan  8 09:44:08 prodsys-dmz-zfs2 scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: 
> /pci@0,0/pci8086,3410@9/pci1000,72@0 (mpt_sas0):
>  Jan  8 09:44:08 prodsys-dmz-zfs2        Unable to allocate dma memory for 
> extra SGL.
>  Jan  8 09:44:10 prodsys-dmz-zfs2 scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: 
> /pci@0,0/pci8086,3410@9/pci1000,72@0 (mpt_sas0):
>  Jan  8 09:44:10 prodsys-dmz-zfs2        Unable to allocate dma memory for 
> extra SGL.
>  Jan  8 09:44:10 prodsys-dmz-zfs2 scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: 
> /pci@0,0/pci8086,3410@9/pci1000,72@0 (mpt_sas0):
>  Jan  8 09:44:10 prodsys-dmz-zfs2        MPT SGL mem alloc failed
>  Jan  8 09:44:11 prodsys-dmz-zfs2 rpcmod: [ID 851375 kern.warning] WARNING: 
> svc_cots_kdup no slots free
> 
> I am able to resolve the last error by adjusting upwards the duplicate
> request cache sizes, but have been unable to find anything on the MPT
> SGL errors.
> 
> Anyone have any thoughts on what this error might be?
> 
> At this point, we are simply going to apply patches to this box (we do
> see an outstanding mpt patch):
> 
> 147150 -- < 01 R-- 124 SunOS 5.10_x86: mpt_sas patch
> 147702 -- < 03 R--  21 SunOS 5.10_x86: mpt patch
> 
> But we have another identically configured box at the same patch level
> (admittedly with slightly less workload, though it also undergoes
> monthly zfs scrubs) which does not experience this issue.
> 
> Ray
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to