On 14 January, 2013 - Cindy Swearingen sent me these 2,3K bytes:

> Hi Jamie,
>
> Yes, that is correct.
>
> The S11u1 version of this bug is:
>
> https://bug.oraclecorp.com/pls/bug/webbug_print.show?c_rptno=15852599

Host oraclecorp.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)

Would oracle.internal be a better domain name?

> and has this notation which means Solaris 11.1 SRU 3.4:
>
> Changeset pushed to build 0.175.1.3.0.4.0
>
> Thanks,
>
> Cindy
>
> On 01/11/13 19:10, Jamie Krier wrote:
>> It appears this bug has been fixed in Solaris 11.1 SRU 3.4
>>
>> 7191375      15809921        SUNBT7191375 metadata rewrites should 
>> coordinate with
>> l2arc
>>
>>
>> Cindy can you confirm?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Richard Elling <richard.ell...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     On Jan 4, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Robert Milkowski
>>     <rmilkow...@task.gda.pl <mailto:rmilkow...@task.gda.pl>> wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>>     Illumos is not so good at dealing with huge memory systems but
>>>>     perhaps
>>>>     it is also more stable as well.
>>>
>>>     Well, I guess that it depends on your environment, but generally I
>>>     would
>>>     expect S11 to be more stable if only because the sheer amount of bugs
>>>     reported by paid customers and bug fixes by Oracle that Illumos is not
>>>     getting (lack of resource, limited usage, etc.).
>>
>>     There is a two-edged sword. Software reliability analysis shows that
>>     the
>>     most reliable software is the software that is oldest and unchanged.
>>     But
>>     people also want new functionality. So while Oracle has more changes
>>     being implemented in Solaris, it is destabilizing while simultaneously
>>     improving reliability. Unfortunately, it is hard to get both wins.
>>     What is more
>>     likely is that new features are being driven into Solaris 11 that are
>>     destabilizing. By contrast, the number of new features being added to
>>     illumos-gate (not to be confused with illumos-based distros) is
>>     relatively
>>     modest and in all cases are not gratuitous.
>>       -- richard
>>
>>     --
>>
>>     richard.ell...@richardelling.com
>>     <mailto:richard.ell...@richardelling.com>
>>     +1-760-896-4422 <tel:%2B1-760-896-4422>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zfs-discuss mailing list
>> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


/Tomas
-- 
Tomas Forsman, st...@acc.umu.se, http://www.acc.umu.se/~stric/
|- Student at Computing Science, University of UmeƄ
`- Sysadmin at {cs,acc}.umu.se
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to