The following article makes an argument against the United Nations that, thought I had never heard before, makes perfect sense, and leads me to wonder why I had never heard it before. (I'm also slightly embarrassed that I had never thought of it before.)
United Nations James Humes Wednesday, Oct. 23, 2002 <<http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/10/22/230948.shtml>> The argument in a nutshell: When did the United Nations become the supreme moral authority of the world? One might advance such a proposition if most of the organization were represented by democratic governments, but that is not the case. Of the 191 nations in the United Nations only about 40 percent (85 countries) are democratic societies that enjoy political rights and civil liberties. The rest are either controlled by dictators or by a one-party government. CB ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at /// /// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html /// ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: archive@jab.org EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
