[Chris Withers, about getting at the collection of modified objects] > How hard would it be to expose?
The coding would be trivial in ZODB 3.6 (earliest version a new feature could land) if limited solely to Connection objects. More work to specify the interface and write tests. > Would there be any performance implications? None from just from exposing the current Connection._registered_objects implementation detail via an official API. Whether that would be suitable for all intended purposes I don't know -- I haven't seen detailed use cases. Doubt it's a good idea regardless. As Jim wrote, "things like this" _should_ be approached not by adding an endless number of new APIs, but by introducing an event system. I don't know what the performance implications of that may be, since ZODB has nothing like it at present. _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
