On 2/3/06, Gary Poster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 3, 2006, at 9:12 AM, Florent Guillaume wrote: > > > Gary Poster wrote: > >> On Jan 26, 2006, at 10:16 PM, Gary Poster wrote: > >> I'm a bit surprised there was so little discussion: ZC has needed > >> a persistent queue several times in the past. Whether the queue > >> would be based on what I proposed or on something else someone > >> else has, it seems like it would be a good thing to have. > >> However, with only Julien replying I don't think that's enough to > >> push it further. I'll keep it in zasync until/unless some better > >> option comes around. > > > > Like Julien I'd like to encourage you to put it in the core. I'd > > say, in the "persistent" module. > > OK: I'll push this a bit more then. Thanks to you and Julien for > your encouragement, and for Julien's offer of help.
As I recall from conversations a few years back, a persistent queue is indeed useful and surprisingly difficult to get right (or, at least, get right with decent performance). Sounds like a good candidate for ZODB. Jeremy _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev