Jim Fulton wrote at 2007-8-20 10:15 -0400: >Excellent analysis snipped.... > >> 1. and 3. (but obviously not 2.) could be handled by >> implementing "STICKY" not by a bit but by a counter. > >This has been planned for some. :/
I have (reread) this in your "Different Cache Interaction" proposal. Thanks to the GIL, it will also work for concurrent access from different threads -- if "Used" and "Unused" are notified while the GIL is held. -- Dieter _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
