On Dec 7, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Dec 7, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
It sounds like I should write some pickle and cPickle tests and
we should update the ZODB trunk to take advantage of this. (/me
fears gettimg mired in Python 3.)
Jim
Would you do that on Python 2.4, 2.5 or ... ?
I would do it on "?". ;)
I'd help with pleasure...
I guess I'd need to do it for 2.4, 2.5, trunk and hope that pickle
hasn't been ported to Python 3 yet. :)
This is just a fairly simple test, so shouldn't be a big deal.
... but I fear it would take you longer to explain what to do than
to do it.
Maybe. I bet all that's needed is to reuse the existing persistent_id
tests using inst_persiistent_id. I haven't looked at the tests yet.
At which point, one might a test to distinguish the 2 cases. And, of
course, eventually, the tests will need to get checked in. I can do
that. You might be able to write the tests without much input from
me. OTOH, I'll get to them eventually. :)
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
Zope Corporation
_______________________________________________
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
