Hi, On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 08:28:48PM -0600, Shane Hathaway wrote: > Christian Theune wrote: >> Hi, >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 05:34:59PM -0500, Kenneth Miller wrote: >>>> Hello all, >>>> >>>> I'm currently developing my application ontop of zodb/zeo, and the >>>> idea of having the Zeo server the only single point of failure still >>>> bothers me. My question is, has anyone thought of any solutions for >>>> this. My idea was to have a few or more background processes that kept >>>> multiple servers synced and concurrent. Any thoughts? >> Just to make sure that all of the authors involved with anything here >> spoke >> up, please refer to the other two mails by Gary and Shane. ;) > > Heh. > > How is the ZEO RAID project going, anyway? It seems like a good idea and I > don't think it actually depends on ZEO, does it? For example, I wonder if > it's possible to create a RAID storage around a set of RelStorage > instances.
We have alpha1 out there (see the zope.org repository) with full fail-over and recover facilities. We made some changes to the ZODB trunk to clean up some interfaces and make ZEO support the more elaborate protocol details. > I got a report from one person who put RelStorage behind a ZEO server. > Apparently it works fine, though I haven't tried it myself. Maybe we're > finally reaching the point where we can choose from several ZODB storage > components and connect them with ease. Yes, reaching that stage would be nice. Christian -- gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstrasse 29 - 06112 halle (saale) - germany www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 - fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
