On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Martin Aspeli <optilude+li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jim Fulton wrote: > >> In any case, nothing is deleted in subversion. If someone creates even >> minimal tests that exercise the code you changed, then I'll >> be happy to reapply the change. At some point, if no one takes >> responsibility for repozo, I'm inclined to remove it from the >> distribution, as there is an implied promise of support, >> which seems to be lacking. > > I think all hope of anyone taking the ZODB seriously outside those > already wedded to it would be lost if there wasn't some kind of > supported backup solution.
Have I ever said a supported backup solution wasn't important? BTW, offline back ups if file-storage even with Blobs is straightforward without repozo. ... > The correct course of action here, in my opinonion, is not to make > threats, but to try to encourage people to step up. I find that a > positive message works much better for encouragement than a negative one. I haven't made any threats. It is dishonest to include a backup tool in ZODB that isn't supported. Users would have expectations that aren't met. Jim -- Jim Fulton _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev