pypy as ironpython have internal JIT compilers. However, I will see later the results and post them here as pure ZODB would be ready.
of course ironpython gener .NET intermadiate code (bytecode), but I don't care. We will see how and where it leads...... Tamer Am 26.10.2011 23:52, schrieb Leonardo Santagada: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Jim Fulton <j...@zope.com> wrote: >>>> If this is a customer project, I'd recommend dropping either >>>> iron python or ZODB at this stage. >>> Why that?! As I know, ironpython creates with the JIT compiler bytecode >>> in realtime. >> >> Because this is going to be pretty new code and you'll be a trail blazer. > > AFAIK iron python is not considerably faster than cpython, so I think > you will end up with exactly the same performance problems of cpython > using a pure python ZODB on ironpython. > >>> what about pypy ?! >> >> It will be interesting to see how much of the performance pypy >> can gain back. > > As has been shown with the json module pypy can be really fast with > pure python code, in the next version of pypy the pure python json > module is faster than the c extension optimizer _json on cpython. So I > really think ZODB can be faster on pypy, the problem being how much > work would it be? > > But looking at a future of a pure python ZODB faster than the one we > have today (that is quite fast) would be awesome. Not so much for the > speed but to be able to implement everything in the language we all > love :) > > Good luck with your work. _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see http://zodb.org/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev