On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Leonardo Santagada <santag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Jim Fulton <j...@zope.com> wrote: >> >> - solr is so fast it almost makes me want to cry. At ZC, we're >> increasingly using solr instead of the catalog. As the original >> author of the catalog, this makes me sad, but we just don't have the >> time to put in the effort to equal solr/lucene. > > > We are using it on some projects also... But deploying java is as > complicated as python to deploy so it increases 2x the deployment work > needed for a project.
Yup, integration is a downside, which is why we still use catalogs or related indexing structures too. > Do you think this could be a good idea, to have an > integrated solution of ZODB for object persistence and integrated indexing > using Whoosh? I have no idea. I'm not familiar with whoosh. > Probably what would be needed is a project to wrap them > together, that does indexing during the commit and exposes an indexing api, > like marking fields in persistent objects for indexing and having methods > for searching the index. <shrug> I know people have come up with tools to index ZODB objects with lucene in the past. Jim -- Jim Fulton http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton Jerky is better than bacon! http://zo.pe/Kqm _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see http://zodb.org/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev