On 3/29/07, Bill Sommerfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 17:07 +0300, Niclas Sodergard wrote:
> On 3/29/07, Jerry Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > # zoneadm -z mytest install
> > > zoneadm: /zones/mytest: Value too large for defined data type
> > > could not verify zonepath /zones/mytest because of the above errors.
> > > zoneadm: zone mytest failed to verify
> >
> > While this doesn't help with your immediate issue, this is a known
> > bug:
> >
> > 6433526 zoneadm should use statvfs64
> >
> > It was fixed in opensolaris in b44 and it is also fixed in S10u4, although
> > that is not available yet.
>
> Hi Jerry,
>
> Thanks for the info. I just have to revise my setup plans a bit then
> because I can't wait for u4.
as a general rule you can work around "xxx should use statvfs64"-related
bugs by setting an under-2TB quota on the filesystem.
(I've long thought that statvfs space reporting should have been defined
so that it returns the maximum value which fits in the field instead of
failing with EOVERFLOW when the actual value doesn't fit, but for
whatever reason, the standards gurus didn't do that)
Well, the 2TB quota will save me until I have access until 10u4.
cheers,
Nickus
_______________________________________________
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
