Hi all,
My english should not good enough to make you understand. STOP please to write zonepath on ZFS is supported. Everytime you say that, the next sentence is to say "but with limitations, blabla". How many customer made the error to use ZFS as zonepath, and few months later got a "no way" when asking how to patch or upgrade ? I'm sorry to be so critic, but I'm pretty sure (I said pretty !) that U3 documentations never states the fact that patching would be difficult. And the worse is what patching strategies/technics are becoming...ok new patching technologies are an amazing box of innovations, but you didn't think of customer which tries to trust you from the beginning. Just take a look to the sequence : - Solaris 10u3 was declared mature, ZFS included, etc, etc. At the same time, SAMs told to their customers that S8 is becoming so old, they should think to migrate to S10 - S10u3 stated that you CAN put zonepath on ZFS, but you may have difficulties to upgrade. The deal is : use ZFS on SAN and simplify zonepath transfer from one host to another, or work with SVM metaset. But at this stage, we thought that we could live without easy upgrade by patching...LU with zonepath on ZFS would come a day. - There was 2 releases between u3 and u6, and you're telling that we have to wait again ? Do you really think you were right to say zfs for zonepath is supported ? Send a survey to support teams in regions, I would be curious to see the result. No, you can't continue, please ! Give us zfs zonepath ! Nicolas 01010101 01001110 01001001 01011000 Nicolas Dorfsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +33 6 7981 4486 Skype: ndorfsman http://www.guses.org - French Speaking (Open)Solaris User Group http://www.solaris-fr.org - French OpenSolaris Wiki _______________________________________________ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org