On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 18:25, Patrick Hunt<ph...@apache.org> wrote: > The configure script is free license (it's in the header of the file). IANAL > but based on my understanding of apache license requirements this makes the > file a "TYPE A" license, as there are no other stated requirements wrt > notice, we are in compliance.
I'm not saying that the license is incompatible, I am saying that you need to record third party contributions in the NOTICE file. See http://apache.org/licenses/example-NOTICE.txt http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/trunk/NOTICE.txt http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk/NOTICE.txt http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/NOTICE.txt http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/hbase/trunk/NOTICE.txt and probably many, many others Bernd PS: I don't think it is particulary nice to close a vote when there are ongoing discussions. > Patrick > > Bernd Fondermann wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> There is foreign code in the release tar ball, which is not attributed >> to in the top-level LICENSE/NOTICE file. >> see for example >> src/c/configure >> So I guess it is not safe to release this as-is. >> >> It would be nice if the release artifacts would be named >> apache-zookeeper... >> but this more my personal taste than a requirement. >> >> Bernd >> >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 06:02, Patrick Hunt<ph...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hadoop PMC, >>> >>> Please test and vote on this release in zookeeper-dev list. >>> >>> Patrick >>> >>> Hadoop PMC, >>> >>> Please test and vote on this release in zookeeper-dev list. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Patrick >>> >>> I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.2.1. This is a bug fix >>> release addressing a number of significant issues -- see the release >>> notes >>> for details. >>> >>> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the >>> *** vote closes EOD on Wednesday, September 2.*** >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.2.1-candidate-0/ >>> >>> Should we release this? >>> >>> Patrick >>> >>> >>> >>> >
