[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870159#action_12870159
]
Gregory Haskins commented on ZOOKEEPER-776:
-------------------------------------------
Hi Henry,
I'll do one better and add a JUnit to address the first "-1" as well ;)
Im just testing the junit now, and will submit the updated patch shortly.
Should I cancel the previous patch and delete the old attachment?
> API should sanity check sessionTimeout argument
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-776
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-776
> Project: Zookeeper
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: c client, java client
> Affects Versions: 3.2.2, 3.3.0, 3.3.1
> Environment: OSX 10.6.3, JVM 1.6.0-20
> Reporter: Gregory Haskins
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.4.0
>
> Attachments: zookeeper-776-fix.patch
>
>
> passing in a "0" sessionTimeout to ZooKeeper() constructor leads to errors in
> subsequent operations. It would be ideal to capture this configuration error
> at the source by throwing something like an IllegalArgument exception when
> the bogus sessionTimeout is specified, instead of later when it is utilized.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.