I've added a link to the email thread to ZOOKEEPER-723 [1]. I've also created a new JIRA for the approach I've suggested ZOOKEEPER-834 [2] I will try to provide a patch after I finish my GSoC assignment.
For me it seems like a good idea to allow a session to create / own an ephemeral tree and not just leafs under persistent znodes. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-723 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-834 On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > Take a look at the following. Would be a great feature to add. (search the > mail archives for a full discussion, we should rehash that on the jira, or > at least link the jira to that thread - would appreciate if someone could > add a comment to the jira with that.) > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-723 > > On 08/06/2010 06:39 AM, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: >> >> Hey Andrei, >> >>> I was just re-reading part of the ZooKeeper documentation and I was >>> trying to understand why ephemeral znodes should not have children >>> znodes. Adding this feature, while maintaining an important >>> restriction, could be really useful. >> >> Indeed. There was some discussion about this idea in this mailing >> list a few months ago, and the conclusion IIRC is that it is indeed an >> interesting feature, and there's an approach which is apparently >> feasible too without too much trouble, but no one is taking care of >> the idea right now. It'd be good to find someone that is interested >> in trying it out (hint hint). >> > -- Indekspot -- http://www.indekspot.com -- Managed Hosting for Apache Solr
