[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Koch updated ZOOKEEPER-837:
----------------------------------
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
first try without testing. Would like to hear your opinion about the direction.
> cyclic dependency ClientCnxn, ZooKeeper
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-837
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-837
> Project: Zookeeper
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: 3.3.1
> Reporter: Patrick Datko
> Assignee: Thomas Koch
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-837.patch
>
>
> ZooKeeper instantiates ClientCnxn in its ctor with this and therefor builds a
> cyclic dependency graph between both objects. This means, you can't have the
> one without the other. So why did you bother do make them to separate classes
> in the first place?
> ClientCnxn accesses ZooKeeper.state. State should rather be a property of
> ClientCnxn. And ClientCnxn accesses zooKeeper.get???Watches() in its method
> primeConnection(). I've not yet checked, how this dependency should be
> resolved better.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
