[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12909556#action_12909556
 ] 

Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
------------------------------------

Hi Flavio,

As I mentioned earlier, this is a temporary patch until the selector based 
approach (non-blocking IO)  is ready.

In general, what is the concern with the current fix? There will be only one 
thread running at a time. The thread just makes sure that we can bound the 
connection time. This patch is working well for us as a temporary fix. Apart 
from the overhead of starting a thread I don't see anything wrong with the fix.

Again, given that this bug is a blocker for us, we certainly cannot wait until 
the non-blocking implementation  is done and released.

Thanks.
-Vishal

> Leader election taking a long time  to complete
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-822
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822
>             Project: Zookeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: quorum
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.0
>            Reporter: Vishal K
>            Assignee: Vishal K
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 3.3.2, 3.4.0
>
>         Attachments: 822.tar.gz, rhel.tar.gz, test_zookeeper_1.log, 
> test_zookeeper_2.log, zk_leader_election.tar.gz, zookeeper-3.4.0.tar.gz, 
> ZOOKEEPER-822.patch_v1
>
>
> Created a 3 node cluster.
> 1 Fail the ZK leader
> 2. Let leader election finish. Restart the leader and let it join the 
> 3. Repeat 
> After a few rounds leader election takes anywhere 25- 60 seconds to finish. 
> Note- we didn't have any ZK clients and no new znodes were created.
> zoo.cfg is shown below:
> #Mon Jul 19 12:15:10 UTC 2010
> server.1=192.168.4.12\:2888\:3888
> server.0=192.168.4.11\:2888\:3888
> clientPort=2181
> dataDir=/var/zookeeper
> syncLimit=2
> server.2=192.168.4.13\:2888\:3888
> initLimit=5
> tickTime=2000
> I have attached logs from two nodes that took a long time to form the cluster 
> after failing the leader. The leader was down anyways so logs from that node 
> shouldn't matter.
> Look for "START HERE". Logs after that point should be of our interest.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to