This sounds great. Thanks mahadev
On 10/16/10 1:56 AM, "Thomas Koch" <tho...@koch.ro> wrote: > Benjamin Reed: >> actually, the other way of doing the netty patch (since i'm scared of >> merges) would be to do a refactor cleanup patch with an eye toward >> netty, and then another patch to actually add netty. [...] > Hi Benjamin, > > I've had exactly the same thought last evening. Instead of trying to find the > bug(s) in the current patch, I'd like to start it over again and do small > incremental changes from the current trunk towards the current ZOOKEEPER-823 > patch. > Maybe I could do this in ZOOKEEPER-823 patch, this would mean to revert the > already applied ZOOKEEPER-823 patch. > Then I want to test each incremental step at least 5 times to find the step(s) > that breaks ZK. > This approach should take me another two weeks, I believe, mostly because each > Test run takes ~15-25 minutes. > > Cheers, > > Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro >
