+1 I put it up on a cluster under hbase and ran loads against it over last few hours. Nothing untoward in logs. Played around w/ zkcli. It seems to behaving same as 3.3.1.
St.Ack On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Henry Robinson <he...@cloudera.com> wrote: > +1 > > Python looks good. > > On 10 November 2010 14:51, Michi Mutsuzaki <mic...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > >> +1. >> >> I ran my benchmark test on the release candidate for one hour, and got >> similar numbers as 3.3.0. >> >> --Michi >> >> On 11/10/10 11:09 AM, "Mahadev Konar" <maha...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: >> >> > +1 for the release. >> > >> > Ran ant test and a couple of smoke tests. Create znodes and shutdown >> > zookeeper servers to test durability. Deleted znodes to make sure they >> are >> > deleted. Shot down servers one at a time to confirm correct behavior. >> > >> > Thanks >> > mahadev >> > >> > >> > On 11/4/10 11:17 PM, "Patrick Hunt" <ph...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> >> I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.2. This is a bug fix >> >> release addressing twenty-six issues (eight critical) -- see the >> >> release notes for details. >> >> >> >> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the >> >> *** vote closes 11pm pacific time, Tuesday, November 9.*** >> >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.2-candidate-0/ >> >> >> >> Should we release this? >> >> >> >> Patrick >> >> >> > >> > >> >> > > > -- > Henry Robinson > Software Engineer > Cloudera > 415-994-6679 >
