Anyone out there? On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Congrats on the release. Now that has been completed, I'd like to see > if you guys are willing to revisit the issue of a maven based build. > If yes, I'd be happy to assist making that happen. > > Regards, > Hiram > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Our first official Apache release has shipped and I'm already looking >> forward to 3.1.0. ;-) >> >> In particular I believe we should look at the following for 3.1.0: >> >> 1) there are a number of issues that we're targeted to 3.1.0 during the >> 3.0.0 cycle. We need to review and address these. >> >> 2) system test. During 3.0.0 we made significant improvements to our test >> environment. However we still lack a large(r) scale system test environment. >> It would be great if we could simulate large scale use over 10s or 100s of >> machines (ensemble + clients). We need some sort of framework for this, and >> of course tests. >> >> 3) operations documentation. In general docs were greatly improved in 3.x >> over 2.x. One area we are still lacking is operations docs for >> design/management of a ZK cluster. >> see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-160 >> >> 4) JMX. Documentation needs to be written & the code reviewed/improved. >> Moving to Java6 should (afaik) allow us to take advantage of improved JMX >> spec not available in 5. We should also consider making JMX the default >> rather than optional (ie you get JMX by default when ZK server is started). >> We need to ensure that ops can monitor/admin ZK using JMX. >> >> 5) (begin) multi-tenancy support. A number of users have expressed interest >> in being able to deploy ZK as a service in a cloud. Multi-tenancy support >> would be a huge benefit (quota, qos, namespace partitioning of nodes, >> billing, etc...) >> >> Of course ZooKeeper is open to submissions in that aren't on this list. If >> you have any suggestions please feel free to enter a JIRA or submit a patch. >> >> >> Additionally I'd like to see us move to an 8 week release cycle. I've >> updated the JIRA version list to reflect this. Due to the holiday season >> approaching I've listed 3.1.0 with a ship date of Jan 19th. (see the roadmap >> on the JIRA). >> >> If you have any questions/comments please reply to this email. >> >> Patrick >> > > > > -- > Regards, > Hiram > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com > > Open Source SOA > http://open.iona.com >
-- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com Open Source SOA http://open.iona.com
