Martin Aspeli wrote: > Hanno Schlichting wrote: > >> PhiliKON some time ago suggested that Five should wrap the utilities >> eventually but nobody followed up on that idea. > > Philipp also has some ideas (not too far off completion, I believe) that > may remove some of the acquisition intermingling. I'm not sure they'd > apply here.
Yep, he worked on making the Zope 2 security policy aware of the ILocation interface as an alternative to the Acquisition hierarchy IIRC. This is targeted at Zope 2.11 though and last time I asked he still got segfaults ;) >> Ah yep, you are of course right. My main point was probably that it >> shouldn't rely on the request (unless passed in explicitly as a method >> argument). > > And sometimes we have methods that can legitimately take a 'context' > parameter. Quite often, this is because we were really after a view, > though. For example, most of PloneTool.py is a hodge-podge of random > things that were needed in page templates and Script (Python)'s but that > people wanted in filesystem code. That crap has to be refactored completely. The complete Plone tool has to be ripped apart and turned into nice utilities and views... Hanno _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
