yuppie wrote:
Laurence Rowe wrote:
yuppie wrote:
<snip/>
and adapterizing workflow status and history:
http://plone.org/products/roadmap/221
+1
I just would prefer named adapters over multi-adapters. And deprecate
getHistoryOf, setStatusOf and getStatusOf.
The problem with using named adapters is that it becomes necessary to
make individual registrations for every workflow id. You could have
all calling code fallback to general interface lookup, but this would
make it pretty much impossible to deprecate getHistoryOf, setStatusOf
and getStatusOf. Perhaps I've missed a better way of handling this?
Now I see why you didn't propose named adapters. But I'm still not happy
with adapting (IContentish, basestring). Did you consider to add getId()
to IWorkflowDefinition and to adapt (IContentish, IWorkflowDefinition)?
Then I don't see how you would register adapter for a specific (TTW or
generic setup defined) workflow.
Perhaps a named adapter lookup falling back to a plain adapter lookup is
the best solution?
Laurence
_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
