-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hanno Schlichting wrote: > Jens Vagelpohl wrote: >> There's an egg with version 0.3 on the cheeseshop, is that an acceptable >> version? I simply linked in what I had here from the current CMFCore >> trunk, but that external is against the five.localsitemanager trunk and >> the package itself contains no version information whatsoever >> (documentation foul!). > > The CMF 2.1 branch uses the five.lsm 0.3 tag, which is identical to the > trunk, except that trunk states it is going to be version 0.4. > > On PyPi there are both an egg as well as a source distribution for the > 0.3 release. > > The CMF trunk currently points to the five.lsm trunk, which doesn't have > a version information inside it, as it only uses a part of the actual > package. The version information is in the root setup.py, whereas CMF > only pulls in the src/five/localsitemanager part of it. > > Why did we do the above at all? Because we didn't want to require anyone > to install a package for the CMF 2.1 line on top of extracting the > tarball into the Products folder. For CMF trunk I personally think it is > OK, to state a proper dependency in setup.py for both CMF and > GenericSetup now and remove the five.lsm inclusion hack from CMFCore.
+1. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH0YDY+gerLs4ltQ4RAqsCAJ44QyrLAeMlrEIyf0Iiw4Gszw6i/wCfRF7T z0ZhK+jTRjKCuuFm1GQgrNQ= =B/Vv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
