-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12 Oct 2006, at 17:57, Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 10.10.2006, 23:35 Uhr, schrieb Paul Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
If you fail to use -k, the zope test runner will delete bytecode
for all
your products - including mxODBCZopeDA, which has no .py files to
fall
back on. Ouch. I'll investigate further - there might be a bug to
file
against zope.testing.
For development purposes of this nature you might drop mxODBCZopeDA
in your SOFTWARE_HOME rather than INSTANCE_HOME which should protect.
Since I've come against this myself, I'd really like to know a single
sane reason to ship just pyc files. Don't get me wrong, I like the
product and will recommend it all day long, but shipping just pyc
files is odd. Not only gives it a queasy feeling of "well, I guess
they really don't trust their paying customers", it also legally
prevents me from creating patches to help you guys because that would
imply I ran one of the easily-available code decompilers against
those Python modules. Even regardless of the ease with which pyc
files can be reconstituted into readable Python.
I just couldn't come up with one good reason.
jens
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFFLtcKRAx5nvEhZLIRAhUVAJ9+0YQ0Y5iG5G7h++9onGBwFHenfACgp6UB
DXY4uDHG5BeOiQNjXM86x40=
=Mmx4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Zope-DB mailing list
Zope-DB@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-db
