"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
> Maybe, maybe not. I think perhaps the most compelling argument from
> Digital Creations' viewpoint for having an expanded "access" file might be
> the simplification of the setup process for customers. And it would also
> make it easier to:
>
> 1) Phase out unownedness (user databases wouldn't need it)
> 2) Narrow the role of superuser (super-can-create hack can go away)
> 3) Do Zope virtual hosting and give somebody a Zope root and even
> superuser, while still being able to log in
> 4) Stop all the whining from people who want to know why superuser can't
> create or own objects any more. :)
This sounds great, what happened about it?
cheers,
Chris
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
