Re: [Zope-dev] OracleStorage, and possibly others

[Chris McDonough]

> Of course it would, for the same reasons as OracleStorage (eg
> FileStorage/Data.fs is inefficient)

Actually, it's the other way around.  OracleStorage is 30-to-50 times slower
than FileStorage on writes.  Reads are slow too but the slowness is somewhat
negated by caching.



_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )