[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> This is true in the ZODB, but can be complicated by acquisition.
Cheap cop-out: I was planning to avoid acquisition in my "business object"
database (which will be a database separate from the Zope ZODB). Personally,
I'm not very convinced of the necessity and advantages of acquisition,
contrasted with the issues that often arise because acquisition picks a
different thing from what the developer thought it would do. It seems OK for a
strictly hierarchical collection of web-enabled objects, but I am thinking
about a business model, where I don't see a lot of advantages in inflicting
behavior onto objects through a containment hierarchy. But then, I didn't read
the original paper so please prove me wrong.
--
Cees de Groot http://www.cdegroot.com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG 1024D/E0989E8B 0016 F679 F38D 5946 4ECD 1986 F303 937F E098 9E8B
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
