[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Any ideas what the performance would be compared to medusa?
Nope. However, it is pretty fast, and Zope is slow anyway, since it's so dynamic. >>4) Good integration with threads - while event based, twisted has a very >>nice model for dealing with threaded apps. >> > What benefits would this really give? What drawbacks would we have to deal > with? Overall I have noticed that python does not seem to actually thread > very well since there is that global lock. I'm not sure how ZServer does it, but mixing asyncore and threaded apps isn't fun, to say the least. > This part sounds pretty cool I will definitely have to look at it some > more. I looked at it a little while ago and it looked very cool however > zope has some serious things that twisted does not. Mainly I really like > how the access control system works, the user folder system and the object > store. Which is why I said we should stay with Zope's current stuff and not build on twisted's own high level web package, just it's low-level HTTP support. > We could essentially keep the ZMI however I do think the ZMI is due for a > large rewrite soon. I'm not saying anything about the ZMI - if done correctly people would never know medusa was replaced, since this is a very low-level part of Zope. _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )