On Wednesday 10 October 2001 08:09 am, Michel Pelletier wrote: > > Just to throw out another idea, Amos has discussed with me in the past the > idea of replacing medusa with Apache 2.0. Compelling as many of Twisted's > features may be, Apache 2.0 as far as i can tell supports many of them as > well (except perhaps jython integration, which is a pipe dream anyway for > Zope). Apache has the upshot in that it is rock solid, tested by millions, > trusted by even more, and no doubt one of the most actively developed > peices of software there is. > > For ZC the upshots of 1) not needing to maintain it, and 2) it being a > excellent marketing tool outweight many technical benifits that twisted may > have that Apache doesn't (I'd like to know what the differences are, > however). For example, does twisted do URL rewriting? proxy? > process/thread job control?
i'd never thought i'd see the day, open source software advocating the inclusion of other open source software because of marketing dictates. > I'm not dismissing the idea, I'm just pointing out an alternative to > Itamar's alternative. ;) my alternative to your alternative, is aolserver and mozilla. no mozilla isn't a webserver, but why should zope be either. cheers kapil _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )