On Tuesday 08 January 2002 09:47 am, Chris McDonough allegedly wrote: > > I think that a much better approach, if modification time is important > > to your application, is to store the application modification time in the > > object as a data attribute. > > It might be better to cause common Zope objects to do what Casey proposes > (maybe via SimpleItem) as opposed to making folks keep app modtimes for > those and as opposed to changing the semantics of > bobobase_modification_time. In Zope2, this would be achieved via a mixin > named something like Modifiable mixed in to DTML Document, File, etc. > > - C
That had been my original instinct, but I wasn't sure. It sounds like the best way to approach it. I think this is complex enough so that a formal (if short) fishbowl proposal is probably warranted to discuss whether it should be part of an existing mix-in or a new one. /---------------------------------------------------\ Casey Duncan, Sr. Web Developer National Legal Aid and Defender Association [EMAIL PROTECTED] \---------------------------------------------------/ _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
