vio wrote: > Could someone have a look at the following 'Boring' class with the > security functionality added (as described in ZopeBook/6.Security > and some other products). Could 'security' machinery be broken in > Zope-2.4.1 ? It surely doesn't seem to work as adverised, on my > machine at least (Debian Linux 2.2, Zope 2.4.1 (source release) > python 2.1.0, linux2). Tell me if it works on your installation.
> > Boring.py -------------------------------- __doc__ = "" __version__ > = '0.1' import Globals from Globals import HTMLFile # fakes a > method from a DTML file from Globals import MessageDialog # provid from > Globals import Persistent # makes an object stick in the ZODB import > OFS.SimpleItem import Acquisition import AccessControl.Role from > AccessControl import ClassSecurityInfo > > READ_PERM = 'View Stuff' WRITE_PERM = 'Change Stuff' security = > ClassSecurityInfo() You have declared your ClassSecurityInfo object at the module level, rather than as an attribute of the class you wish to make security statements about. Please do not cross-post to both [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Post to one or the other. -- Steve Alexander _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )