Chris Withers wrote: > seb bacon wrote: > > > > It wouldn't surprise me - ZPT has the roughly the same overheads as DTML > > for the language parsing, but a presentation template goes through an > > HTML parser in addition - which is always going to be quite slow in > > python. > > IIRC, The HTML Parser is only used during compilation, not on every render. > > I would have thought it'd eb a priority to get ZPT to be at least as fast as > DTML...
Last I heard there was a benchmark it said ZPT was about 40% slower than DTML, and they were quite happy about this as DTML does all kinds of funky optimization while ZPT did not. I forget where I read that though, and it was a while ago, and I may not remember that figure right. Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
