seb bacon wrote: > > I think the use cases driving synchronisation requirements are not yet > sufficiently understood. Agreed, it's a feature that many people need, > but I get the impression it would be premature to include ZSyncer as is > in Zope without more detailed planning. On the other hand, there is an > argument which says, ZSyncer is a good product used by a lot of people, > let's put it in Zope and deal with any issues after the event.
Yeah... maybe we need a standard "Zope Expansion Kit" that is a cohesive package of products that aren't in the Zope core, but are officially sanctioned and versioned and released alongside versions of Zope. -- Steve Alexander _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
