On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 23:01:04 -0400, "Chris McDonough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It would be best to make make a dual-mode undoing and nonundoing storage on >a per-object basis. But a half step would be to make it easier to use >mounted storages ala >http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/StorageAndConnectionTypeRegistri >es. A dual mode storage, or simply dual storages? Storing counter objects *only* in a non-undo storage would be more pleasant if ZODB supported cross-storage object references. Toby Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
