Myroslav Opyr wrote: > > For FreeBSD there is another pthreads related bug in Python. And > quick-patch from > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=554841&group_id=5470&atid=305470 > with THREAD_STACK_SIZE=0x20000 solves the problem. But it is quick and > dirty hack. Will it be solved in next bugfix release of Python? > Whom/where I have to contact to have progress regarding the issue? > > I'll post comment into SF tracker because site which crashed > previously works fine now (for 5 days already)... Is that sufficient? > This dirty patch is not acceptable and clean solution have to take > place. Should I take part and try to develop one?
Well, the way you start threading with pthreads requres a single initializer for the stack size; once you have initialized the threading environment you cannot change the stacksize later, to the best of my knowledge. I suppose you could finesse a new python startup argument, or environment variable check. I think the SF tracker is the best way to approach that. -- Matt Kromer Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com/ _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
