"R. David Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > it would be really sad. So if that is a ruling criterion, I'd > vote for two versions of structured text, preferably with a > translator between them.
Well, it would be easy enough (or maybe not, with current stx code) for structured text to accept either indentation or rST-style underlining to indicate headers. I wonder if it's possible to design a system that doesn't require indentation at all, but allows it as an alternate mechanism - without causing more confusion. _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
