Same thing on Debian. 'Data.fs.in' is missing there as well. This is a problem for me as the ZopeTestCase relies on a working Testing package and error reports start to trickle in...
AFAIK, 'Data.fs.in' already contains things like the root Application object and the Control_Panel. If no base is given to the DemoStorage, these objects would have to be created every time. Also, 'Data.fs.in' is only 75kb and setting up a test ZODB from it is very fast. Using a large(r) Data.fs file as base for DemoStorage slows things down _considerably_. I am wondering how "getting rid of Data.fs.in" is supposed to look like, and for now am all for advising the packagers not to break the Testing package. ;-) Stefan --On Mittwoch, 11. September 2002 09:05 +0100 Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Craeg K Strong wrote: >> >> I was just curious as to what the status is on this. >> I just had to apply the patch to yet another Win2000 computer. >> Thanks, > > Well, whoever packages the Win32 binaries needs to re-package them > properly. OR we need to be told that Data.fs.in should no longer be used. > In which case, we need to change the testing package. > > cheers, > > Chris > > > _______________________________________________ > Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev > ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** > (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce > http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ) -- Those who write software only for pay should go hurt some other field. /Erik Naggum/ _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )