Chris Withers wrote at 2003-10-8 21:22 +0100: > Casey Duncan wrote: > > > I would argue that a better plan would be to only use _v_ vars for completely > > disposable data only. The application should expect that this values will be > > gone at any random time, not just at transaction boundaries. > > I agree with this. How do we go about find code that uses the assumption that > _v_ stuff won't change unless it's at a transaction boundary?
This will invalidate many current uses: * use for database connections * use for skin data * ... Dieter _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
