--On Montag, 20. Dezember 2004 11:08 Uhr -0500 Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Jim Fulton]We include all of docutils in Zope 3 and don't adjust the paths. We *did*adjust docutils slightly.
[Andreas Jung]No, Zope 3 ships only with the 'docutils' subdirectory of the Docutils package.
[Jim]What is it lacking?
I suppose it's the 'docs', 'extras', 'licenses' and 'tools' subdirectories, although I see that the 'tools' subdirectory checked in on Zope-2_7-branch was stripped of its GPL'ed pieces first.
Andreas, does Zope 2 *use* any of the stuff in the non-docutils subdirectories?
Jim, while I personally don't care much, Zope3's repackaging of docutils doesn't meet license requirements to retain the original licenses in derivative works. Zope2's does, because it includes docutil's whole 'licenses' subdirectory (except for the GPL).
I think we should stop the discussion at this point and follow Tres suggestion:
- import Docutils somewhere into the CVS/SVN
- link the docutils/docutils subfolder to lib/python in the CVS
- move roman.py into parsers/rest as Jim did for Zope 3
I have no idea how we should with this issue in the SVN. Maybe svn:externals will do the job either to the Docutils version within Z3 or a shared Docutils shared somewhere within the SVN.
Andreas
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
